Legal Opinion

In re Weidner

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided November 17, 1994No. OSB 91-124; SC S36671PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

In this Bar disciplinary case, a trial panel found the accused guilty of numerous violations of criminal statutes and of 19 violations of disciplinary rules. The trial panel’s decision was disbarment.1 Under ORS 9.536(2), review by this court is automatic. Review is conducted de novo under ORS 9.536(3).

The accused has raised various defenses to the Bar’s charges of disciplinary misconduct contained in its amended complaint against the accused. The accused relies on a general defense of “necessity.” He does not, however, apply that defense to the Gannon Estate charges. Therefore, before…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Wills v. Nehalem Coal Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1908
  2. Ellis v. RobertsOregon Supreme Court · 1986
  3. Hanns v. HannsOregon Supreme Court · 1967
  4. Stephan v. Equitable Savings and Loan AssociationOregon Supreme Court · 1974
  5. Kelly v. TracyOregon Supreme Court · 1956

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. In Re Complaint as to Conduct of MartinOregon Supreme Court · 1998
  2. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of AltstattOregon Supreme Court · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API