Legal Opinion

Wills v. Nehalem Coal Co.

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided June 16, 1908PublishedCited by 65 opinions

From Clatsop: Thomas A. McBride, Judge. Statement by Mr. Commissioner Slater. On September 10, 1901, the defendant corporation was organized with a capital stock of $150,000, divided into 1,500 shares of the par value of $100 each, for thé purpose of developing and working coal mines in this state.

Read the full summary

From Clatsop: Thomas A. McBride, Judge. Statement by Mr. Commissioner Slater. On September 10, 1901, the defendant corporation was organized with a capital stock of $150,000, divided into 1,500 shares of the par value of $100 each, for thé purpose of developing and working coal mines in this state. W. H. Copeland, who had subscribed for one share; Mrs. M. S. Copeland, who subscribed for 750 shares and is the former’s wife; W. J. Cook, R. V. Jones, each of whom subscribed for one share, and one other unknown person were elected directors thereof, and have ever since continued in that office.…

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Commissioner Slater.

1. Nothing was claimed by the defendants under the first assignment of the demurrers, but the issues presented by the briefs and arguments of counsel refer wholly to the second assignment, and the sole question is: Are there sufficient facts alleged to entitle plaintiffs *76to any equitable relief? The demurrer admits the truth of what is well pleaded and of every reasonable and proper inference deducible therefrom. No facts are alleged, however,, upon which an equity court may appoint a receiver for the assets of the corporation and wind up its affairs.

2. In…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Hawes v. OaklandSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
  2. Dimpfell v. Ohio & Mississippi Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1884
  3. Converse v. BlumrichMichigan Supreme Court · 1866
  4. Burke v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1873
  5. Yale Gas Stove Co. v. WilcoxSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1894

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by65 opinions

  1. Old Dominion Copper Mining & Smelting Co. v. BigelowMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1909
  2. Derenco, Inc. v. Benj. Franklin Federal Savings & Loan Ass'nOregon Supreme Court · 1978
  3. McIver v. NormanOregon Supreme Court · 1948
  4. Musgrave Et Ux. v. Lucas Et Ux.Oregon Supreme Court · 1951
  5. Barnes v. Eastern & Western Lumber Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1955

60 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API