Legal Opinion

Collins v. Ketter

Colorado Court of Appeals

Decided April 3, 1986No. 83CA0943PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SMITH, Judge.

Plaintiffs appeal the partial summary judgment entered in favor of defendants in which the trial court found as a matter of law that plaintiffs did not have an easement by way of necessity over defendants’ road. They further appeal the court’s judgment for defendants, entered after trial on the remaining issues, based on findings that the road is not a public one and that defendants have not been estopped by their actions to deny plaintiffs use of the road. We affirm.

Plaintiffs are owners of land adjacent to a subdivision known as the Heathermeade Third Addition. Defendants…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Wagner v. FairlambSupreme Court of Colorado · 1963
  2. Martino v. FleenorSupreme Court of Colorado · 1961
  3. Wasalco, Inc. v. El Paso CountyColorado Court of Appeals · 1984
  4. Aubert v. Town of FruitaSupreme Court of Colorado · 1977
  5. Dennett v. Mt. Harvard Development Co.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1979

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. LeSatz v. DeshotelsColorado Court of Appeals · 1988
  2. Campbell v. Summit Plaza AssociatesColorado Court of Appeals · 2008
  3. Thompson v. WhinnerySupreme Court of Colorado · 1995
  4. Patel v. Planning Board of North AndoverMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1989
  5. Freeman v. Rost Family TrustColorado Court of Appeals · 1999

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API