Legal Opinion

Thompson v. Whinnery

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided May 15, 1995No. 93SC495PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Lohr

This case presents the issue of whether an implied easement of necessity was created across lands now owned by petitioners Nicole Renea Thompson and Sonya Ann Thompson for access to ten acres of land now owned by respondent Helen E. Whinnery (Whinnery) when a 194 acre parcel, of which the ten acres is a part, was severed by conveyance in 1938 from the adjoining lands of the Thompsons. 1 The ten acres is physically separated from the remainder of the 194 acre parcel by Elk Creek and the canyon through which it runs. The trial court determined that an implied easement of necessity was created…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Wagner v. FairlambSupreme Court of Colorado · 1963
  2. Martino v. FleenorSupreme Court of Colorado · 1961
  3. Miller v. SchmitzAppellate Court of Illinois · 1980
  4. LeSatz v. DeshotelsColorado Court of Appeals · 1988
  5. State Department of Highways, Division of Highways v. Denver & Rio Grande Western RailroadColorado Court of Appeals · 1988

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Carroll v. MeredithCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 2001
  2. Gosney v. GlennCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 2005
  3. Owens v. BrownlieSupreme Court of Iowa · 2000
  4. Campbell v. Summit Plaza AssociatesColorado Court of Appeals · 2008
  5. Bear Creek Development Corp. v. Genesee FoundationColorado Court of Appeals · 1996

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API