Legal Opinion

Campbell v. Summit Plaza Associates

Colorado Court of Appeals

Decided February 7, 2008No. 06CA0688PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Judge ROTHENBERG.

In this action concerning an implied easement of necessity, defendant, Summit Plaza Associates (SPA), appeals the trial court's (1) summary judgment in favor of third-party defendant, RGB, Inc., doing business as Land Title Guarantee Company of Summit County (Land Title); (2) judgment granting plaintiffs, Michael M. and Theresa J. Campbell, an implied easement of necessity over SPA's property; and (8) judgment finding that SPA breached the contract of sale and warranty against encumbrances and awarding the Campbells damages, attorney fees, costs, interest, and…

2Cases cited39 opinions

  1. Cary v. United of Omaha Life Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 2003
  2. HealthONE v. Rodriguez ex rel. RodriguezSupreme Court of Colorado · 2002
  3. Koonce v. Brite EstateTexas Supreme Court · 1984
  4. Mancuso v. United Bank of PuebloSupreme Court of Colorado · 1991
  5. Riddle v. State Highway CommissionSupreme Court of Kansas · 1959

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Alpine Bank v. HubbellCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2009
  2. Sheffield Services Co. v. TrowbridgeColorado Court of Appeals · 2009
  3. Morris v. Belfor USA Group, Inc.Colorado Court of Appeals · 2008
  4. Yellowstone River, LLC v. Meriwether Land Fund I, LLCMontana Supreme Court · 2011
  5. Platt v. Aspenwood Condominium Ass'n, Inc.Colorado Court of Appeals · 2009

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API