Legal Opinion

Rogers v. Riverside Land & Irrigating Co.

California Supreme Court

Decided February 26, 1901No. L.A. No. 772PublishedCited by 8 opinions

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Riverside County. J. W. Ballard, Judge presiding. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtVan Dyke,j.

J. — On the fifth day of February, 1890, the North Riverside Land and Water Company was the owner of the portion of the canal in question here, from the source of the same in the Rancho San Bernardino down to the west line of the Rubidoux Rancho, and on that day conveyed the same to the Stearns Ranchos Company. The deed of conveyance contained the following reservation: “Hereby specially reserving, however, the right of way to carry through such canal the 350 inches of water, being the same 350 inches reserved by first party in its conveyance of other water to second party by indenture dated…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Rhodes v. MummeryIndiana Supreme Court · 1873
  2. Attorney General v. Union Society of WorcesterMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1874
  3. Dyer v. FitchSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1874

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Baar v. SmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
  2. Estrin v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1939
  3. Laramie Rivers Co. v. Pioneer Canal Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1977
  4. McAllister v. Union Indemnity Co.California Supreme Court · 1935
  5. Colorado National Bank v. ColeSupreme Court of Colorado · 1924

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API