Laramie Rivers Co. v. Pioneer Canal Co.
Wyoming Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
ROSE, Justice.
The primary question in these consolidated appeals concerns the parties’ relative obligations, under certain written instruments, to pay for the cost of constructing a measuring flume on a jointly-owned water supply canal. Pioneer Canal Company (hereinafter the plaintiff) filed an action seeking a money judgment against Laramie Rivers Company (hereinafter the defendant), urging that the defendant was responsible for all the costs of the flume under a 1909 deed or, alternatively, for a proportional share of the costs under either a 1964 agreement or an unjust-enrichment theory.…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Tavares v. HorstmanWyoming Supreme Court · 1975
- Rissler & McMurry Co. v. Atlantic Richfield Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1977
- Layman v. State Unemployment Compensation CommissionOregon Supreme Court · 1941
- Stock v. RoeblingWyoming Supreme Court · 1969
- Binning v. MillerWyoming Supreme Court · 1944
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Madrid v. NortonWyoming Supreme Court · 1979
- Wells Fargo Bank Wyoming, N.A. v. HodderWyoming Supreme Court · 2006
- Fegler Ex Rel. Fegler v. BrodieWyoming Supreme Court · 1978
- Curless v. CurlessWyoming Supreme Court · 1985
- Jelly v. DabneyWyoming Supreme Court · 1978
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.