Legal Opinion

Lido Capital Corp. v. Vogel

New York City Court

Decided October 26, 1936PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMcNulty, J.

This is an action to recover the sum of $342, being a balance due on an assigned claim for goods sold and delivered to the defendant. It was conceded at the trial by counsel for both sides that the merchandise sold and delivered by plaintiff’s assignor to the defendant consisted of intoxicating liquors, and that said sales and delivery took place while the Prohibition Amendment was in full force and effect.

The sole issue of fact which arose at the trial was the amount of the balance due by the defendant to the plaintiff. The defendant admitted owing a balance of $111. At the trial the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. United States v. ChambersSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  2. Curtis and Others v. . LeavittNew York Court of Appeals · 1857
  3. Central Bank v. Empire Stone Dressing Co.New York Supreme Court · 1857
  4. Washburn v. FranklinNew York Supreme Court · 1861
  5. Bloch v. Frankfort Distillery, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1936

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Fitzsimons v. Eagle Brewing Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1939
  2. W. L. Hailey & Co. v. County of NiagaraCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1967
  3. Government of French Republic v. CabotNew York Supreme Court · 1947
  4. Abrams v. MeyerowitzCity of New York Municipal Court · 1940
  5. Rutkin v. ReinfeldDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1954

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API