Bloch v. Frankfort Distillery, Inc.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
The second amended complaint contains two causes of action. The first cause of action alleged a sale by defendant of 470 cases of whisky to Bert K. Bloch, a wholesale liquor dealer at New York city, prior to October 1, 1921, and while the National Prohibition Act and the regulations prescribed for its enforcement were in effect, and a contract of storage of said whisky which was breached by defendant by changing its location without notice, causing a loss of insurance when said whisky was in large part destroyed by fire. Order granting, on reargument, plaintiffs’ motion for summary judgment…
2Cited by10 opinions
- Goldfarb v. GoldfarbAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982
- Farber v. John Aquino Sons, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1938
- Lido Capital Corp. v. EskelsenNew York Supreme Court · 1936
- Government of French Republic v. CabotNew York Supreme Court · 1947
- Lido Capital Corp. v. VogelNew York City Court · 1936
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.