Legal Opinion

Rutkin v. Reinfeld

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided June 22, 1954PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MURPHY, District Judge.

These are motions by defendants under Rules 50(a) and 50(b), Fed.Rules Civ.Proc., 28 U.S.C.A., (1) to dismiss the complaint and supplemental complaint and for a directed verdict at the close of plaintiff’s case, (2) for a directed verdict at the close of all of the evidence, and (3) after verdict by the jury for plaintiff, to set aside that verdict and enter judgment on one directed for defendants. Judgment having been reserved on the first two sets of motions, all three are considered in this opinion.

Plaintiff sued to recover $22,000,000 in damages resulting from a…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
  3. Guaranty Trust Co. v. YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  4. Guaranty Trust Co. v. YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  5. United States v. KisselSupreme Court of the United States · 1910

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Rutkin v. ReinfeldCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1956
  2. Rutkin v. ReinfeldCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1956
  3. James v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  4. James v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1961

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API