Legal Opinion

Village of Dimondale v. Grable

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided June 26, 2000No. Docket 213277PublishedCited by 39 opinions

1Per curiam

Defendant, Leslie A. Grable, appeals as of right from an order granting summary disposition in favor of Richard E. Albert, for whom the village of Dimondale has been substituted on appeal. Grable argues that the trial court erroneously quieted title to his land in Richard E. Albert, who later sold the land to Dimondale, because the tax deed Albert acquired to Grable’s property was void. We agree and reverse.

I. STATUTORY BACKGROUND

This case involves the application of three separate and distinct provisions of the Internal Revenue Code, each of which relates to the process by which the federal…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Robinson v. Shell Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1997
  2. Spiek v. Department of TransportationMichigan Supreme Court · 1998
  3. Nasser v. Auto Club Ins. Ass'nMichigan Supreme Court · 1990
  4. Ritchie-Gamester v. City of BerkleyMichigan Supreme Court · 1999
  5. Prysak v. R L Polk Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1992

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by39 opinions

  1. Peterson Novelties, Inc v. City of BerkleyMichigan Court of Appeals · 2003
  2. Marilyn Froling Revocable Living Trust v. Bloomfield Hills Country ClubMichigan Court of Appeals · 2009
  3. CMI International, Inc. v. Intermet International Corp.Michigan Court of Appeals · 2002
  4. Doe v. Henry Ford Health SystemMichigan Court of Appeals · 2014
  5. Wickings v. Arctic Enterprises, IncMichigan Court of Appeals · 2001

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API