Legal Opinion

Monroe v. State

Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)

Decided May 22, 1984No. 04-83-00390-CRPublishedCited by 195 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

2Per curiam

This appeal is from a conviction for the offense of attempted capital murder. Upon appellant’s plea of not guilty in a trial before the court, punishment was assessed at life imprisonment in the Texas Department of Corrections.

Appellant’s court-appointed attorney, who was trial counsel, has filed a brief in which he has concluded that this appeal is wholly frivolous and without merit. Counsel asserts compliance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967) and its Texas progeny. The brief submitted does not meet the minimum requirements of Anders, High…

3Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Anders v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. High v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1978
  3. Currie v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1974
  4. Guillory v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1977
  5. Tommie A. Johnson v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1966

4Cited by195 opinions

  1. Wilson v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2001
  2. Williams v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1998
  3. Anastacio Guerra v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)2005
  4. Anastacio Guerra v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)2005
  5. Anastacio Guerra v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)2005

190 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API