Legal Opinion

Tommie A. Johnson v. United States

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided May 2, 1966No. 19969PublishedCited by 38 opinions

1Per curiam

In Ellis v. United States, 356 U.S. 674, 78 S.Ct. 974, 2 L.Ed.2d 1060, (1958), the Supreme Court held that an indigent is entitled to representation by counsel acting as an advocate. In examining the role of appointed counsel the Court stated:

If counsel is convinced, after conscientious investigation, that the appeal is frivolous, of course, he may seek to withdraw on that account. If the court is satisfied that counsel has diligently investigated the possible grounds of appeal, and agrees with counsel’s evaluation of the case, then leave to withdraw may be allowed * ■* *

356 U.S. at 675, 78…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Ellis v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  2. Hardy v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1964

3Cited by38 opinions

  1. Anders v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. High v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1978
  3. Monroe v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1984
  4. Commonwealth v. MoffettMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1981
  5. In Re SmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API