Legal Opinion

Williams v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided August 20, 1998No. 13-97-857-CRPublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

2Per curiam

This is an appeal by McCullion Dwight Williams from the revocation of a probated sentence. Williams’s court-appointed counsel filed what purports to be a brief in compliance with the requirements of Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Other than a broad recitation of the nature of the case, Williams’s attorney merely contends in a single sentence that he reviewed the court’s record and “believes that no meritorious argument or point of error exists.” No pro se brief has been filed.

Counsel appointed to represent an indigent may determine an appeal is…

3Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Anders v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. High v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1978
  3. Currie v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1974
  4. McCoy v. Court of Appeals of Wisconsin, District 1Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
  5. Jeffery v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1995

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by19 opinions

  1. Wilson v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2001
  2. Andres Gilberto Flores v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2012
  3. Elio Garza v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2015
  4. Elio Garza v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2015
  5. Elio Garza v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2015

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API