Legal Opinion

Coleman v. Crawford

Washington Supreme Court

Decided August 4, 1926No. 19639. En BancPublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBridges, J.

— The appellant is the daughter of Biram I. Coleman, deceased, and his first wife, Pearl Coleman, deceased. The respondent Gertrude Crawford was the second wife of Hiram I. Coleman, and the respondent Clarence I. Coleman is the son of Biram I. Coleman, deceased, and Gertrude Coleman, now Gertrude Crawford. Hiram and Pearl were married in January, 1900, and Pearl died in 1903. In February, 1905, Hiram married Gertrude, and died in March, 1908, his heirs being Gertrude, his widow, Clarence, his son, and Vera, his daughter. No administration was ever had upon the estate of the first wife. After…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Palmquist v. SagstadWashington Supreme Court · 1910
  2. State ex rel. Keasal v. Superior CourtWashington Supreme Court · 1913
  3. Krohn v. HirschWashington Supreme Court · 1914
  4. Polk v. MartinWashington Supreme Court · 1914
  5. In re the Estate of AlfstadWashington Supreme Court · 1902

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Dunham v. StitzbergNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1948
  2. Olivier Straw Goods Corporation v. Osaka Shosen KaishaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1931
  3. In Re the Estate of RandallIdaho Supreme Court · 1942
  4. In Re DemingWashington Supreme Court · 1937
  5. Haden v. EavesNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1950

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API