Legal Opinion

Krohn v. Hirsch

Washington Supreme Court

Decided August 13, 1914No. 11802PublishedCited by 21 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for King county, Smith, J., entered November 1, 1913, dismissing an action to quiet title and for partition, after a trial on the merits.

1Opinion of the CourtParker, J.

— The plaintiffs seek recovery from the defendant of their claimed interest in certain real property, situated in the city of Seattle, and also seek partition of the property between themselves and the defendant. The defendant holds the property under a decree of distribution rendered by the superior court for King county in the administration of the estate of James McCarthy, deceased, wherein the whole of the property was awarded to respondent as the widow of James McCarthy. The plaintiff Mattie Krohn claims an interest in the property as the sister and heir of James McCarthy upon the ground…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. United States v. ThrockmortonSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  2. Case of Broderick's WillSupreme Court of the United States · 1875
  3. Pico v. CohnCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
  4. Sohler v. SohlerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902
  5. Campbell-Kawannanakoa v. CampbellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Farley v. DavisWashington Supreme Court · 1941
  2. National Exploration Co. v. RobinsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1929
  3. Meeker v. WaddleWashington Supreme Court · 1915
  4. Short v. ThompsonIdaho Supreme Court · 1936
  5. Coleman v. CrawfordWashington Supreme Court · 1926

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API