Legal Opinion

City of Anchorage v. Anderson

District Court, D. Alaska

Decided September 12, 1951No. A-6817Published

1Opinion of the Court

FOLTA, District Judge.

The question presented is whether an appeal to this Court from a judgment of conviction of a municipal court may be dismissed for failure of the defendant to appear for trial.

Defendant was convicted on March 21, 1951, of operating a business without the license required by an Ordinance of the City of Anchorage, and sentenced to pay a fine of $5. He appealed to this Court which, upon his failure to appear for trial, ordered his bail of $100 forfeited, dismissed the appeal and gave judgment as in the Court below, as apparently required by Section 69-6-9, A.C.L.A. 1949,…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Thompson v. City of BirminghamSupreme Court of Alabama · 1928
  2. City of Birmingham v. ReedAlabama Court of Appeals · 1949
  3. Chenowith v. KeenanWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1906
  4. Fowlkes v. Central Supply Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1933
  5. In re JorgeDistrict Court, D. Alaska · 1945

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API