Durfee v. Garvey
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, and from an order refusing a new trial. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
Belcher, C. C.
The plaintiff and defendant are owners of adjacent tracts of land in Los Angeles County, the defendant’s land lying to the southwest of the plaintiff’s. Plaintiff’s land is nearly level, and a large portion of it is swampy, and unfit for cultivation without artificial drainage. It has a slight inclination toward the southwest, and commencing on defendant’s land, about six or seven hundred yards from plaintiff's line, is a well-defined channel, called the Arroyo Honda, which leads off to the southwest. From plaintiff’s line to this arroyo was a slight depression, through which,…
2Cited by16 opinions
- City of Pasadena v. California-Michigan Land & Water Co.California Supreme Court · 1941
- Coulsen v. Aberdeen-Springfield Canal Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1929
- Eugene C. Walsh and Lois M. Walsh v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982
- Nielson v. SandbergUtah Supreme Court · 1943
- Davis v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1893
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.