Legal Opinion

B.M.B. v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided July 10, 2003No. C3-03-92PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

ANDERSON, RUSSELL A., Justice.

Plaintiff B.M.B. obtained a judgment, in state district court, against Ronald K. Hal-liday for compensatory and punitive damages resulting from Halliday’s nonconsen-sual sexual contact with B.M.B. Halliday’s insurer, defendant State Farm Fire and Casualty Company (State Farm), denied coverage. Halliday then assigned his State Farm policy rights to B.M.B., who commenced suit for breach of insurance contract in federal district court against State Farm. The federal district court denied State Farm’s motion for summary judgment on grounds that the policy’s…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Chevron Oil Co. v. HusonSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Clemmer v. Hartford Insurance Co.California Supreme Court · 1978
  3. Hoff v. KemptonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
  4. Ruvolo v. American Casualty Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1963
  5. Iowa Kemper Insurance Co. v. StoneSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1978

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Bendorf v. Commissioner of Public SafetySupreme Court of Minnesota · 2007
  2. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co. v. Dynamic Air, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2005
  3. SECURA Supreme Insurance Company v. MSMCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2008
  4. Save Our Creeks v. City of Brooklyn ParkSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2005
  5. Thomas v. Benchmark InsuranceSupreme Court of Kansas · 2008

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API