Legal Opinion

Glover v. Udren Law Offices, P.C.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 23, 2014PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION BY

DONOHUE, J.:

In these appeals, Mary E. Glover, individually and on behalf of a similarly situated class (“Glover”), and Ed Ella and Eric Johnson, individually and on behalf of a similarly situated class (“the Johnsons”), appeal from the orders of court sustaining preliminary objections filed by Udren Law Offices, P.C. (“Udren”) and Phelan Halli-nan & Schmieg, LLP (“Phelan”) and dismissing the appellants’ complaints with prejudice. We affirm.

At the outset, we explain our decision to address these appeals together. The claims raised by Glover and Johnson are based on similar facts,…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Toy v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
  2. Commonwealth v. BrownSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
  3. Commonwealth v. Sitkin's Junk Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1963
  4. Commonwealth v. LobiondoSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  5. Roethlein v. Portnoff Law Associates, Ltd.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2013

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Generation Mortg. Co. v. Bung Thi NguyenSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2016
  2. Trunzo v. Citi MortgageDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2014
  3. Glover, M., Aplt. v. Udren Law OfficesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2016
  4. Johnson v. Phelan Hallinan & Schmieg, LLPSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2019
  5. Stuart v. Udren Law Offices P.C.District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2014

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API