Legal Opinion

Stuart v. Udren Law Offices P.C.

District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania

Decided June 9, 2014No. Civ. No. 4:13-CV-00303PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM

MATTHEW W. BRANN, District Judge.

The Defendant, Udren Law Offices P.C.,1 filed a Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs Complaint for failure to state a claim under Federal Rule Civil Procedure 12(b)(6). Plaintiffs Complaint, filed February 7, 2013, seeks redress for Defendant’s alleged violation of the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1692 et seq. (“FDCPA”). The Court exercises jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1337 and 15 U.S.C. § 1692k(d).

For the reasons discussed, the Defen--dant’s Motion to Dismiss is granted and the Plaintiffs Complaint is dismissed with prejudice.

I.…

2Cases cited9 opinions

Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
Fowler v. UPMC SHADYSIDECourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2009
Laura Kropelnicki, Plaintiff-Appellant-Cross-Appellee v. Hal Siegel, Linda Strumpf, Defendants-Appellees-Cross-AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2002
George Wilson, on Behalf of Himself and All Others Similarly Situated v. Quadramed Corporation, George WilsonCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2000

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

Trunzo v. Citi MortgageDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2014
Balon v. Enhanced Recovery Co.District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2017