Legal Opinion

Sweitzer v. Brown

United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims

Decided October 22, 1993No. 92-337PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FARLEY, Judge:

This appeal presents an issue of statutory interpretation: whether appellant “suffered an injury, or an aggravation of an injury ... as a result of having submitted to an examination_” 38 U.S.C.A. § 1151 (West 1991). In a decision dated October 23, 1991, the Board of Veterans’ Appeals (Board) held that appellant had not submitted a well grounded claim to entitlement to compensation under § 1151 because any additional lower back disability he may have sustained was not the result of hospitalization, medical treatment, or examination by the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA). The…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Gardner v. DerwinskiUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 1991
  2. Talley v. DerwinskiUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 1992

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Meeks v. WestUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 1999
  2. Tallman v. BrownUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 1995
  3. Zevalkink v. BrownUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 1994
  4. David L. Hornick v. Eric K. ShinsekiUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 2010
  5. Herman L. Loving , Jr. v. R. James NicholsonUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 2005

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API