Legal Opinion
David L. Hornick v. Eric K. Shinseki
United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims
Decided August 20, 2010No. 08-3221PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GREENE, Judge:
Veteran David L. Hornick appeals, through counsel, a September 15, 2008, decision of the Board of Veterans’ Appeals (Board) that determined that it was proper for a VA regional office (RO) to sever his May 1996 award of VA compensation benefits under 38 U.S.C. § 1151. Mr. Hornick seeks reversal, arguing, inter alia, that VA erred in severing his award of section 1151 compensation benefits because, under 38 U.S.C. § 1159, that award was protected because it had been in force for more than ten years. The Secretary responds that the Board was bound by General Counsel Precedent…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Skidmore v. Swift & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Bailey v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Barnhart v. Sigmon Coal Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Brown v. GardnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- King v. St. Vincent's HospitalSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Clarence W. King v. Eric K. ShinsekiUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 2014
- Joseph C. Hillyard v. Eric K. ShinsekiUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 2011
- Donald Mulder v. Sloan D. GibsonUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 2014
- Robert L. Trafter v. Eric K. ShinsekiUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 2013
- Viegas v. ShinsekiCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2013
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.