Legal Opinion

State v. Shue

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided December 20, 1972No. 7220SC719PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HEDRICK, Judge.

Defendants assign as error the court’s denial of their motion to continue made on 22 May 1972.

Motions to continue are addressed to the sound discretion of the trial judge and his rulings thereon will not be upset on appeal absent a showing of such abuse of discretion as would deprive the defendants of a fair trial. State v. Gibson, 229 N.C. 497, 50 S.E. 2d 520 (1948) ; State v. Lewis, 7 N.C. App. 178, 171 S.E. 2d 793 (1970), cert. denied 276 N.C. 328 (1970). De fendants’ motion was not supported by affidavit. The record, however, does contain counsel’s statements when he made…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. State v. HarveySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
  2. State v. VirgilSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1970
  3. State v. BellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
  4. State v. . GibsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1948
  5. State v. HowardSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Brenneman v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1978
  2. State v. RudisillCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1973
  3. State v. BemberyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1977
  4. State v. OwenCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1975
  5. State v. GagneCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1974

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API