Legal Opinion

Brenneman v. State

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided October 30, 1978No. CR78-62PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

John A. Fogleman, Justice.

Appellants were found guilty of manufacturing a controlled substance with intent to deliver, in violation of Ark. Stat. Ann. § 82-2617 (a) (1) (ii) (Repl. 1976). The substance was marijuana. It was discovered when two deputies of Sheriff Donald Meeks of Johnson County attempted to serve a citation on one of the appellants. Appellants assert four points for reversal. We find no reversible error.

Appellants’ major contention is that the court erred in refusing to suppress physical evidence seized by officers and introduced into evidence. This was not error. On June 18,…

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. Ker v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. United States v. RabinowitzSupreme Court of the United States · 1950
  3. Agnello v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
  4. United States v. JeffersSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
  5. Herring v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1975

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. State v. SeagullWashington Supreme Court · 1981
  2. Orsini v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1984
  3. People v. WithersIllinois Supreme Court · 1981
  4. Morris v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1990
  5. Renton v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1981

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API