Legal Opinion

State v. Bembery

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided April 20, 1977No. 761SC797PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CLARK, Judge.

The first issue on appeal is whether the seizure of the tires in plain view was in violation of the provision of the Fourth Amendment of the Constitution of the United States *33prohibiting “unreasonable searches and seizures.” (Defendant has not questioned that exigent circumstances existed to seize the tires without warrant.)

The brief for the State cites case law for the proposition that the Fourth Amendment does not apply where no search is made, but that the limits of reasonableness apply to a seizure without a search. Since the proscription that searches and seizures not be…

2Cases cited38 opinions

  1. Coolidge v. New HampshireSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Ker v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. Warden, Maryland Penitentiary v. HaydenSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  4. Harris v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  5. Stanley v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. NanceCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2002
  2. State v. DouglasCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1981
  3. State v. AlexanderCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2014
  4. State v. GriceCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2012
  5. State v. DouglasCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1981

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API