Legal Opinion
Dyous v. Psychiatric Security Review Board
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided July 22, 2003No. SC 16925PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
NORCOTT, J.
The dispositive issue in this appeal is whether the trial court properly determined that it lacked subject matter jurisdiction to consider the appeal by the plaintiff, Anthony Dyous, from the decision of the defendant, the psychiatric security review board (board), transferring him to a maximum security mental health facility. The plaintiff appeals1 from the judgment of the trial court dismissing his appeal. The plaintiff claims that the trial court improperly concluded that, pursuant to General Statutes §§ 4-186 (f)2 *768and 17a-597 (a),3 the board’s order transferring him to a…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Simms v. WardenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
- Westport Taxi Service, Inc. v. Westport Transit DistrictSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
- Figueroa v. C & S Ball BearingSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1996
- Spears v. GarciaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2003
- Lewis v. Connecticut Gaming Policy BoardSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Peters v. Department of Social ServicesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2005
- Lagassey v. StateSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2004
- Wiseman v. ArmstrongSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2004
- Sastrom v. Psychiatric Security Review BoardSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2009
- Goodyear v. DiscalaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2004
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.