Legal Opinion

Doby v. Fowler

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided October 7, 1980No. 8019DC390PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WELLS, Judge.

During its deliberations, the jury requested that they be allowed to reexamine and take plaintiffs exhibit number one into the jury room. Plaintiffs counsel did not object to this procedure. Defendants’ counsel expressed his unwillingness to consent to this procedure. The trial court granted the request and allowed the jurors to take the exhibit into the jury room during further deliberations. Defendants’ sole assignment of error is to this action by the trial court.

In State v. Stephenson, 218 N.C. 258, 265, 10 S.E. 2d 819, 824 (1940), our Supreme Court stated the principle that…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. In Re Will of HallSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1960
  2. State v. . StephensonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
  3. Nicholson v. Eureka Lumber Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1911
  4. Brown v. . BuchananSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1927
  5. State v. GroganCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1979

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Robinson v. Seaboard System RR, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1987
  2. Nunnery v. BaucomCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1999
  3. Gardner v. HarrissCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1996
  4. Collins v. Ogburn Realty Co., Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1980
  5. Dixon v. TaylorCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1993

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API