Legal Opinion
Baird v. Salnave
Michigan Supreme Court
Decided March 20, 1913No. Docket No. 72PublishedCited by 1 opinion
Error to Van Burén; Des Voignes, J. A.ssumpsit by A. F. Baird against Oliver R. Salnave and another upon a promissory note. Judgment for plaintiff. Defendants bring error.
1Opinion of the CourtBrooke, J.
Plaintiff, who is the father of defendant Lottie Salnave, sues his daughter and her husband upon a promissory note, a copy of which follows:
“Sale Note:
“Bangor, Mich., April 1, 1911.
“ One year after date we jointly and severally as principal promise to pay to the order of A. F. Baird the sum of four hundred and twenty ($420) dollars, to draw interest at the rate of 6% per annum from date and attorney’s fees if suit is instituted on this note. Value received.
“ Payable at residence of A. F. Baird.
“ Oliver R. Salnave.
“Lottie Salnave.”
*410The defendants pleaded the general issue, and denied the…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Holmes v. TrumperMichigan Supreme Court · 1871
- Wait v. PomeroyMichigan Supreme Court · 1870
- Bradley v. MannMichigan Supreme Court · 1877
- First National Bank v. CarterMichigan Supreme Court · 1904
3Cited by1 opinion
- Adler v. NusbaumMichigan Supreme Court · 1954