Legal Opinion

People v. Morton

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 16, 1939No. Crim. 3196PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCrail, P. J.

The defendant appeals from a conviction on two counts of robbery and from an order denying his motion for a new trial.

At the trial several witnesses identified the defendant as the man who committed the crimes.

After the order denying the motion for new trial the court allowed the defendant time to procure additional evidence concerning his guilt or innocence. This allowance of time was made upon a direct request of defendant and upon a direct waiver by him of the statutory time for "pronouncing judgment.

The point raised by the defendant is that the trial court erred in pronouncing judgment…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. People v. RubensCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936
  2. People v. DavisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
  3. In Re De VoeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931
  4. People v. Von MoltkeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. People v. GompertzCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951
  2. People v. PoorCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
  3. People v. SchmidtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API