Legal Opinion

Application of Robert A. Boyer, Arthur A. Schulz and Edmond A. Schatzman

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided April 27, 1967No. Patent Appeal 7701PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

WORLEY, Chief Judge.

This appeal is from the decision of the Board of Appeals affirming the examiner’s rejection of claims 1-12 in appellants’ application,1 entitled “Method of Manufacturing a Protein Food Product,” as obvious in view of the prior art.

The invention relates to a method of forming edible protein products designed to simulate natural meats of mammals, fish or fowl. According to the specification, the protein products produced by processes disclosed in certain prior art patents were too dark in color and possessed relatively poor flavor and texture. Appellants treat various…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. In re JewettCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1957
  2. Application of Marion L. SmitleyCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1962
  3. In re PavleckaCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1963
  4. In re KorumCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1946

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Application of Robert A. Boyer, Arthur A. Schulz and Edmond A. SchatzmanCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1967

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API