Legal Opinion

In re Korum

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided March 6, 1946No. 5125PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHateied, Judge

This is an appeal from the decision of the Board of Appeals of the United States Patent Office affirming the" decision of the Primary Examiner rejecting all of the claims (Nos. 22 to 25, inclusive) in appellants’ application for a patent for an alleged invention relating to improvements in feed mill hammers.

Claim 25 is illustrative of the appealed claims. It reads:

25. A feed mill hammer comprising a flat bar of hardened steel adapted to rotate in a mill with its flat sides disposed in planes of rotation, one of said sides being recessed to provide a longitudinally extending rib, thin patches…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. In re HeritageCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1946
  2. In re SlateCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1940

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Application of Marion L. SmitleyCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1962
  2. Application of Robert A. Boyer, Arthur A. Schulz and Edmond A. SchatzmanCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1967
  3. Application of Robert A. Boyer, Arthur A. Schulz and Edmond A. SchatzmanCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1967

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API