Legal Opinion

In re Pavlecka

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided June 20, 1963No. 6971PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWorley, Chief Judge

This appeal is from the decision of the Board of Appeals which affirmed the examiner’s rejection of thirty-one claims in appellant’s application,1 Serial No. 301,010, for a patent for “Interlocked Panel Structure.” Five claims stand withdrawn from consideration under the provisions of Rule 142(b) of the Patent Office.2

*1343Appellant’s application relates to a construction wherein a plurality of panels are fastened together to form a hollow wall by means of slidable keys engaging “stringers” secured to the inner surfaces of spaced opposing panels. Alternatively, the stringers on opposing panels may…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Application of Oliver Kenneth KelleyCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1962

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Application of Leo L. HengeholdCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1971
  2. Application of Scott Searles, JrCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1970
  3. Application of Robert A. Boyer, Arthur A. Schulz and Edmond A. SchatzmanCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1967
  4. Application of Robert A. Boyer, Arthur A. Schulz and Edmond A. SchatzmanCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1967

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API