Legal Opinion

Application of Marion L. Smitley

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided March 9, 1962No. Patent Appeal 6720PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RICH, Judge.

This appeal is from the decision of the Patent Office Board of Appeals affirming the examiner’s rejection of claims 1, 3, 6, 8 and 12 in application Ser. No. 618,-757, filed October 29, 1956, for “Governor.”

Appellant also appeals from the board’s refusal to consider claim 13, proposed by appellant April 29, 1960, in a “Request for Interference” with Wetterhahn patent 2,921,641, issued January 19, 1960, which was after the hearing before the board and before its decision. No claim has been allowed.

The Smitley invention is a vacuum-actuated, “combined engine and road speed governor”…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. In re KylstraCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1937
  2. In re KorumCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1946
  3. In re WiedmanCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1957
  4. In re SweetCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1943
  5. In re KylstraCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1937

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Dr. Hollis K. (Iii) and Patricia D. Leathers v. United States of America Dr. William F. And June B. Blankenship v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1972
  2. Application of Carsten Ingeman JohnsenCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1966
  3. Application of Robert A. Boyer, Arthur A. Schulz and Edmond A. SchatzmanCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1967
  4. Application of Robert A. Boyer, Arthur A. Schulz and Edmond A. SchatzmanCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1967
  5. Dr. Hollis K. (Iii) and Patricia D. Leathers v. United States of America Dr. William F. And June B. Blankenship v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1972

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API