Legal Opinion

Wm. P. Jungclaus Co. v. Ratti

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided March 13, 1918No. 9,476PublishedCited by 14 opinions

From Marion Superior Court (94,959); W. W. Thornton, Judge. Action by tbe William P. Jungelaus Company against Mary Josephine Eatti and others. From a judgment for defendants on their counterclaim, plaintiff appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtHottel, J.

This appeal is from a judgment in appellees’ favor in an action brought by appellant to recover for labor and materials furnished by it under a contract for the erection of a building on appellees’ real estate, and to foreclose a mechanic’s lien against such real estate. In addition to the amount alleged to be due on the contract price, recovery was also asked for extra labor and material alleged to have been rendered and furnished by appellant. The complaint is in one paragraph, to which there is an answer in general denial and a plea of payment. Appellees also filed a counterclaim for…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Chicago & Erie Railroad v. DiniusIndiana Supreme Court · 1913
  2. Davis v. La Crosse Hospital Ass'nWisconsin Supreme Court · 1904
  3. Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. StarksIndiana Court of Appeals · 1914
  4. Charleston Lumber Co. v. FriedmanWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1908
  5. Boland v. ClaudelIndiana Supreme Court · 1914

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. McKee v. Mutual Life Ins. Co. of New YorkIndiana Supreme Court · 1943
  2. Wright v. Peabody Coal Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1948
  3. Schmittler v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1950
  4. Bulen v. Pendleton Banking Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1948
  5. Peter Kiewit Sons' Co. v. Pasadena City Junior College DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1963

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API