Legal Opinion
Hyde v. Russell & Russell, Inc.
California Court of Appeal
Decided December 23, 1959No. Civ. 23382PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHerndon, J.
This action for personal injuries arose out of an accident which occurred on March 23, 1956, when plaintiff fell from a scaffold while engaged in his employment as a welder and steel worker. The sole defendant in the case is Russell and Russell, Inc., a corporation, engaged in the business of renting, leasing, erecting and supplying scaffolding in the construction industry. Plaintiff’s employer, Structural Engineering Company, was a subcontractor on a building project on which Diversified Builders was the general contractor.
Defendant Russell and Russell, Inc., supplied to plaintiff’s employer…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Armenta v. ChurchillCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954
- Atherley v. MacDonald, Young & Nelson, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1956
- Porter v. Montgomery Ward & Co., Inc.California Supreme Court · 1957
- Mula v. MeyerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955
- Hard v. Hollywood Turf ClubCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Spencer v. G. A. MacDonald Construction Co.California Court of Appeal · 1976
- Di Muro v. Masterson Trusafe Steel Scaffold Co.California Court of Appeal · 1961
- Perrine v. Pacific Gas & Electric Co.California Court of Appeal · 1960
- Ritter & Ritter, Inc. Pension & Profit Plan v. the Churchill Condominium Assn.California Court of Appeal · 2008
- Short v. State Compensation Insurance FundCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.