Legal Opinion
E-R-M- & L-R-M
Board of Immigration Appeals
Decided July 1, 2011No. ID 3716PublishedCited by 39 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Cite as
25 I&N Dec. 520
(BIA 2011) Interim Decision #3716 Matter of E-R-M- & L-R-M-, Respondents Decided June 3, 2011 U.S. Department of Justice Executive Office for Immigration Review Board of Immigration Appeals (1) Section 235(b)(1)(A)(i) of the Immigration and Nationality Act, 8 U.S.C. § 1225(b)(1)(A)(i) (2006), does not limit the prosecutorial discretion of the Department of Homeland Security to place arriving aliens in removal proceedings under section 240 of the Act, 8 U.S.C. § 1229a (2006). (2) The fact that an Immigration Judge has no jurisdiction over applications for adjustment of…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- United States v. NixonSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Bordenkircher v. HayesSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Oyler v. BolesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- United States v. ArmstrongSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- United States v. BatchelderSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by39 opinions
- M-SBoard of Immigration Appeals · 2019
- Texas v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 2015
- CAMARILLOBoard of Immigration Appeals · 2011
- Innovation Law Lab v. McAleenanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2019
- Innovation Law Lab v. Chad WolfCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2020
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.