Legal Opinion

Innovation Law Lab v. McAleenan

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided May 7, 2019No. 19-15716PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Per curiam

In January 2019, the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) issued the Migrant Protection Protocols (MPP), which initiated a new inspection policy along the southern border. Before the MPP, immigration officers would typically process asylum applicants who lack valid entry documentation for expedited removal. If the applicant passed a credible fear screening, DHS would either detain or parole the individual until her asylum claim could be heard before an immigration judge. The MPP now directs the "return" of asylum applicants who arrive from Mexico as a substitute to the traditional options of…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Jennings v. RodriguezSupreme Court of the United States · 2018
  2. Nken v. HolderSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  3. Landon v. PlasenciaSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  4. Pereira v. SessionsSupreme Court of the United States · 2018
  5. Nielsen v. PreapSupreme Court of the United States · 2019

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Al Otro Lado v. Chad WolfCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2020
  2. East Bay Sanctuary Covenant v. Donald TrumpCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2020
  3. Innovation Law Lab v. Chad WolfCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2020
  4. E. Bay Sanctuary Covenant v. BarrDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2019
  5. J.J. RODRIGUEZBoard of Immigration Appeals · 2020

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API