Legal Opinion
CAMARILLO
Board of Immigration Appeals
Decided July 1, 2011No. ID 3734PublishedCited by 28 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Cite as
25 I&N Dec. 644
(BIA 2011) Interim Decision #3734 Matter of Judith Elma CAMARILLO, Respondent Decided December 2, 2011 U.S. Department of Justice Executive Office for Immigration Review Board of Immigration Appeals Under the “stop-time rule” at section 240A(d)(1) of the Immigration and Nationality Act, 8 U.S.C. § 1229b(d)(1) (2006), any period of continuous residence or continuous physical presence of an alien applying for cancellation of removal under section 240A is deemed to end upon the service of a notice to appear on the alien, even if the notice to appear does not include the…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Robinson v. Shell Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Immigration & Naturalization Service v. VenturaSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Food & Drug Administration v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Gustafson v. Alloyd Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1995
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- Pereira v. SessionsSupreme Court of the United States · 2018
- MENDOZA-HERNANDEZ and CAPULA-CORTESBoard of Immigration Appeals · 2019
- Yi Wang v. Eric Holder, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2014
- Gustavo Urbina v. Eric Holder, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2014
- Pablo Mejia-Castanon v. Attorney General United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2019
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.