Legal Opinion

Dayton Bar Ass'n v. Rogers

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided October 24, 2007No. 2007-0746PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

{¶ 1} Respondent, Richard Hunter Rogers of Dayton, Ohio, Attorney Registration No. 0017858, was admitted to the Ohio bar in 1974. In 1994, we publicly reprimanded him for violating the following Disciplinary Rules: DR 1-102(A)(3) (prohibiting a lawyer from engaging in illegal conduct involving moral turpitude) and 1-102(A)(4) (prohibiting a lawyer from engaging in conduct involving dishonesty, fraud, deceit, or misrepresentation). Dayton Bar Assn. v. Rogers (1994), 71 Ohio St.3d 283, 643 N.E.2d 539. In 1999, we imposed a one-year stayed suspension on him for his violation of DR 9-102(A)…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Toledo Bar Ass'n v. BattOhio Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Disciplinary Counsel v. HollandOhio Supreme Court · 2005
  3. Disciplinary Counsel v. StollingsOhio Supreme Court · 2006
  4. Dayton Bar Ass'n v. RogersOhio Supreme Court · 1999
  5. Cleveland Bar Assn. v. GreenbergOhio Supreme Court · 2006

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Disciplinary Counsel v. Smith.Ohio Supreme Court · 2017
  2. Disciplinary Counsel v. McCordOhio Supreme Court · 2009
  3. Lorain Cty. Bar Assn. v. Robinson (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2021
  4. Columbus Bar Assn. v. Bahan (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API