Legal Opinion

Young v. Mastrom, Inc.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided June 19, 1990No. 8920DC713PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JOHNSON, Judge.

Mastrom is a business engaged in providing consultant services to the medical and dental professions. Although the three employees’ exact job descriptions are not entirely clear from the record, they apparently worked with Mastrom’s accounting and bookkeeping, and some or all of them worked directly with clients.

As to plaintiff Young’s action against Mastrom, the trial court made the following pertinent findings of fact: Young interviewed for employment with Mastrom in the summer of 1971. He was not shown an employment contract or restrictive covenant during this time. On 16…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. United Laboratories, Inc. v. KuykendallSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1988
  2. A.E.P. Industries, Inc. v. McClureSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1983
  3. Williams v. Pilot Life Insurance CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1975
  4. Whittaker General Medical Corp. v. DanielSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1989
  5. James C. Greene Company v. KelleySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1964

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Hartman v. WH Odell and Associates, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1994
  2. Laboratory Corp. of America Holdings v. KearnsDistrict Court, M.D. North Carolina · 2015
  3. Outdoor Lighting Perspectives Franchising, Inc. v. HardersCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2013
  4. Copypro, Inc. v. MusgroveCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2014
  5. White v. Cross Sales & Engineering Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2006

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API