Legal Opinion

Hartman v. WH Odell and Associates, Inc.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided December 20, 1994No. 9422SC83PublishedCited by 92 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THOMPSON, Judge.

The issue presented by this appeal is whether or not the defendant can enforce a covenant not to compete contained in two successive employment agreements signed by the plaintiff. We hold the covenant not to compete is overly broad and cannot be saved by “blue penciling” the agreement. Therefore, we affirm.

The plaintiff was an employee of the defendant from 1986 to 1991. In 1987 and again in 1989, the plaintiff signed employment agreements containing covenants not to compete.

After plaintiffs resignation in 1991, defendant, through its attorr neys, wrote numerous-letters to…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. A.E.P. Industries, Inc. v. McClureSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1983
  2. Kadis v. . BrittSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1944
  3. Manpower of Guilford County, Inc. v. HedgecockCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1979
  4. Whittaker General Medical Corp. v. DanielSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1989
  5. Jewel Box Stores Corporation v. MorrowSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by92 opinions

  1. Visionair, Inc. v. James & Colossus Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2004
  2. Medical Staffing Network, Inc. v. RidgwayCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2009
  3. Wells Fargo Ins. Servs. United States, Inc. v. LinkSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2019
  4. Farr Associates, Inc. v. BaskinCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2000
  5. Kinesis Advertising, Inc. v. HillCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2007

87 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API