Legal Opinion
American Fur Refining Co. v. Cimiotti Unhairing Mach. Co.
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided July 3, 1903No. 39PublishedCited by 4 opinions
Appeal from the Circuit Court of the United States for the District of New Jersey.
1Opinion of the Court
BUFFINGTON, District Judge.
This is an appeal from a decree entered in the United States Circuit Court for the District of New Jersey against the American Fur Refining Company, appellant, alleging infringement of the eighth claim of patent No. 383,258, granted May 22, 1888, to John W. Sutton, for a machine for plucking furs. The validity of the patent was sustained in Cimiotti Unhairing Company et al. v. Bowsky (C. C.) 95 Fed. 474, a case heard in the Second Circuit, and is not here questioned, the sole issue being alleged infringement. The invention relates to “an improved machine for…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Water-Meter Co. v. DesperSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
- Wright v. YuenglingSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
- Cimiotti Unhairing Co. v. BowskyU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1899
- Weatherhead v. CoupeSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
3Cited by4 opinions
- Cimiotti Unhairing Co. v. American Fur Refining Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1909
- United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. BurkeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1917
- Cimiotti Unhairing Co. v. American Fur Refining Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of New Jersey · 1908
- Buckeye Blower Co. v. Arensmeyer, Warnock & Zahrndt, Inc.District Court, W.D. New York · 1928