Cimiotti Unhairing Co. v. Bowsky
U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York
This was a suit in equity by the Cimiotti Unhairing Company and John W. Sutton against Max Bowsky for alleged infringement of certain patents relating to machines for removing the hairs from fur skins.
1Opinion of the Court
TOWNSEND, District Judge.
Final hearing on bill and answer raising question of infringement of the eighth claim of complainants’ patent, No. 383,258, granted May 22, 1888, to John W. Sutton, and of the four claims of the reissued patent, No. 11,079, reissued May 27, 1890, to Anton Hedbavny; both being for machines for removing hairs from fur skins. These machines are more particularly adapted for the treatment of seal skins, and of so treating the skins of coneys that in their completed state they resemble the genuine seal, being then known as “electric seal.”- The skins of such animals are…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Sutter v. RobinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
- Electric Gas-Lighting Co. v. Boston Electric Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1891
- City of Boston v. AllenCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1898
- Matthews v. Ironclad Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1888
3Cited by7 opinions
- American Fur Refining Co. v. Cimiotti Unhairing Mach. Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1903
- National Binding Mach. Co. v. James D. McLaurin Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1911
- Cimiotti Unhairing Co. v. American Fur Refining Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of New Jersey · 1902
- Cimiotti Unhairing Co. v. MischkeU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1899
- Syracuse Chilled Plow Co. v. Leroy Plow Co.District Court, W.D. New York · 1916
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.