Legal Opinion

Laird v. Director of Patuxent Institution

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided December 7, 1964No. [App. No. 51, September Term, 1964.]PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHenderson, C. J.

In this application for post conviction relief, denied by Judge Harlan in the court below, the attack is upon the jurisdiction of the court that committed him to Patuxent, a point not raised in his application for leave to appeal from the determination of defective delinquency denied in Laird v. Director, 234 Md. 604. That the point is properly before us seems clear from Simon v. Director, 235 Md. 626, 629, Blizzard v. State, 218 Md. 384, 388, and Doxzen v. Director, 236 Md. 657. He was sentenced to 3 years for automobile larceny in 1955, and 7 years for robbery in 1956, to run consecutively…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Eggleston v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1956
  2. Blizzard v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1966
  3. McCloskey v. Director of Patuxent InstitutionCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1963
  4. Simon v. Director of Patuxent InstitutionCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1964
  5. McDonald v. DirectorCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1964

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Gee v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1967
  2. Williams & Fulwood v. Director, Patuxent InstitutionCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1975
  3. Gee v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1965
  4. Doxzen v. DirectorCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1964
  5. Williams & Fulwood v. Director, Patuxent InstitutionCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1975

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API