Legal Opinion
McDonald v. Director
Court of Appeals of Maryland
Decided November 16, 1964No. [App. No. 58, September Term, 1964.]PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
236 Md. 642 (1964)
204 A.2d 563
McDONALD
v.
DIRECTOR OF PATUXENT INSTITUTION
[App. No. 58, September Term, 1964.]
Court of Appeals of Maryland.
Decided November 16, 1964.
Before HENDERSON, C.J., and HAMMOND, PRESCOTT, HORNEY, SYBERT and OPPENHEIMER, JJ.
2Per curiam
This application for leave to appeal from a determination of defective delinquency attacks the constitutionality of the Act on several grounds. His contentions are all answered by prior decisions of this Court. See Eggleston v. State, 209 Md. 504; Meredith v. Director, 226 Md. 653; Simmons v. Director, 227 Md. 661; McDonogh v. Director, 229 Md. 626;…
3Cases cited8 opinions
- Robinson v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Eggleston v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1956
- Simmons v. Director of Patuxent InstitutionCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1962
- McDonough v. Director of Patuxent InstitutionCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1962
- Meredith v. Director of Patuxent InstitutionCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1961
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by3 opinions
- Laird v. Director of Patuxent InstitutionCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1964
- Sansbury v. Director of Patuxent InstitutionCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1965
- Ransom v. WardenCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1964