Legal Opinion

Cleary v. First National Stores Inc.

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided June 24, 1935PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRugg, C.J.

These are actions in tort and in contract, tried together and joined in a single bill of exceptions, to recover compensation for injuries alleged to have been sustained by the several plaintiffs, one being a married woman and the other three her minor children, in consequence of having partaken of cocoa sold by the defendant. At the conclusion of the evidence the mother elected to base her action in contract upon a breach of warranty and the other three plaintiffs elected to proceed in tort. A motion for a verdict for the defendant was allowed in each case.

There was evidence tending to show…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Weiner v. D. A. Schulte, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1931
  2. Leavitt v. Fiberloid Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1907
  3. Ward v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1918
  4. Ash v. Childs Dining Hall Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1918
  5. Rankin v. Brockton Public Market, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1926

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Liberatore v. Town of FraminghamMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1944
  2. Leone v. DoranMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1973
  3. Griggs Canning Co. v. JoseyTexas Supreme Court · 1942
  4. Holt v. MannMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1936
  5. Gelinas v. New England Power Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1971

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API