Legal Opinion

Madison Square Garden Corporation, Ill. v. Carnera

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided July 21, 1931No. 440PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CHASE, Circuit Judge.

On January 13, 1931, the plaintiff and defendant by their duly authorized agents entered into the following agreement in writing;

“1. Camera agrees that he will render services as a boxer in his next contest (which contest, hereinafter called the ‘Pirst Contest,’ shall be with the winner of the proposed Schmeling-Stribling eontest, or, if the same is drawn, shall he with Schmeling, and shall be deemed to be a contest for the heavyweight championship title; provided, however, that, in the event of the inability of the Garden to cause Schmeling or Stribling, as the case may…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Wood v. . Duff-GordonNew York Court of Appeals · 1917
  2. Philadelphia Ball Club, Ltd. v. LajoieSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1902
  3. Shubert v. WoodwardCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1909
  4. Mills-Morris Co. v. Champion Spark Plug Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1925
  5. E. I. Du Pont De Nemours Powder Co. v. SchlottmanCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1914

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Independent Energy Corp. v. Trigen Energy Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1996
  2. Heckard v. ParkSupreme Court of Kansas · 1948
  3. Arias v. SolisDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1991
  4. Lewis v. RahmanDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2001
  5. Vanguard Recording Society, Inc. v. KweskinDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1967

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API