Legal Opinion
E. I. Du Pont De Nemours Powder Co. v. Schlottman
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided November 10, 1914No. 51PublishedCited by 17 opinions
In Error to the District Court of the United States for the Southern District of New York.
1Opinion of the Court
WARD, Circuit Judge.
In July, 1908, one Grubb was negotiating with T. C. Du Pont, president of the Du Pont Powder Company, for the sale of the whole capital stock of the Pittsburgh Fuse Company to the Du Pont Company. July 20th Du Pont wrote to Grubb as follows:
“Mr. Chas. G. Grubb, Building — Dear Sir: Should the deal now under discussion for the Pittsburgh Fuse Mfg. Co. go through, and after we have had the property a year, it is understood that if in my judgment the property has for any reason been worth $175,000 to our company, and we manufac-, tured double tape fuse at $2 per thousand with…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Booth v. Cleveland Rolling Mill Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1878
- Wells v. . AlexandreNew York Court of Appeals · 1891
- Wilson v. . Mechanical Orguinette Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1902
- New York News Publishing Co. v. National Steamship Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1895
- Pritchard v. McLeodCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1913
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Richard W. Shear v. The National Rifle Association of America, a New York CorporationCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1979
- Deering Milliken Research Corp. v. Textured Fibres, Inc.District Court, D. South Carolina · 1970
- Diamond Alkali Co. v. P. C. Tomson & Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1929
- Madison Square Garden Corporation, Ill. v. CarneraCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1931
- New England Oil Corp. v. Island Oil Marketing Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1923
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.