Legal Opinion

Hage v. Luedinghaus

Washington Supreme Court

Decided November 30, 1910No. 8936PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for Lewis county, Rice, J., entered February 8, 1910, upon the verdict of a jury rendered in favor of the plaintiff, in an action for personal injuries sustained by an employee in a logging-camp.

1Opinion of the CourtParker, J.

This is an action to recover damages for personal injuries alleged to have resulted to the plaintiff from the-*681negligence of the defendants while working for them as a chaser and signalman, in their logging operations in Lewis county. By his complaint, the plaintiff alleges negligence on the part of the defendants as follows:

“That on or about the 13th day of April, 1909," the plaintiff while engaged in his duty as a chaser in said crew as was customary was stationed by S. Hover, the hook-tender of said crew, and vice principal of defendants, at a point about 100 feet distant from the donkey…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Stevick v. Northern Pacific Railway Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1905
  2. Jock v. Columbia & Puget Sound RailroadWashington Supreme Court · 1909
  3. Westerlund v. RothschildWashington Supreme Court · 1909
  4. Grim v. Olympia Light & Power Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1906
  5. Berg v. Seattle, Renton & Southern Railway Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1906

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Simon v. Hamilton Logging Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1913
  2. Johansen v. Pioneer Mining Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1914
  3. O'Dell v. Northern Coast Timber Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1911
  4. Lowe v. Oak Point Piling & Lumber Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1913
  5. Larson v. KieburtzWashington Supreme Court · 1912

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API